America’s Dangerous Dirty Little Secret


Every nation on Earth is plagued with inconvenient, and uncomfortable, ‘secrets’ that are widely known by the population, but are hardly ever discussed. America is no different and one of its dirty little secrets is that although the U.S. Constitution was created to guarantee that all citizens are treated equally, a growing number of Republican states are actively seeking protection to discriminate based on religion. It is true that there is an epic religious war to deny women their rights, but that is the subject of another article.

On Friday the Supreme Court announced it will again hear a multitude of Republican states attempt to convince the Court that according the United States  Constitution, they have the legal right to unilaterally abolish the 14th Amendment for the sole purpose of denying gay Americans their Civil Rights. None of the Republican states have the courage to cite their basis for abridging gay Americans’ “equal protections under the law,” but the dirty little secret is their source of empowerment is clearly what they claim to be the “supreme law of the land;” the Christian bible. The other dirty little secret is that politicians, judges, and same-sex advocates are terrified of citing the real source of the drive to deny gays their right to equal protection under the law; religion.

First, in Mississippi, the most religious state in the Union, the mayor of Starkville, Parker Wiseman, met behind closed doors with religious Republicans and decided he had the executive authority to veto a recent Board of Alderman’s decision to rescind a resolution that stated the city is intolerant of discrimination against anyone and in any form. Just last year, Starkville was the first city in Mississippi to adopt a resolution against any form of discrimination; including people in the LGBT community. Three or four other cities followed Starkville’s lead and passed laws revealing they embrace the U.S. Constitution. Besides vetoing the anti-discrimination resolution, religious Republicans also deleted wording in the city’s insurance policy allowing the inclusion of domestic partnerships. There is a reason Mississippi is renowned as the nation’s most religious state.

In Idaho, the governor, C.L. “Butch” Otter appealed to the High Court to ban same-sex marriage in the state since a federal appeals court affirmed it was patently unconstitutional to deny gays equal protections under the law. Otter claims the Fourteenth Amendment does not apply to gays because “the children.” In his petition to the High Court, Otter asserts that his “view of marriage is primarily child-centered. The principal purpose of marriage is to unite a child to his or her biological mother and father whenever possible, and when not possible, to a mother and father. The time has come for this court to resolve a question of critical importance to their citizens and their children.”

Otter is too much of a coward to cite his biblical objection to gays and concealed the dirty little religious secret by claiming his objection is that children benefit from being raised by a heterosexual couple. However, according to the American Sociological Association, the so-called religious studies supporting Otter’s claim are “fatally flawed” and found to be “bullshit” by real academics. In fact, several legitimate scientific studies reveal that children born to same-sex parents fare equally well and often better than their counterparts.

A 2007 study from Tufts University found that children born to same-sex couples did equally well, and in 2010, comprehensive research from Stanford University found that “children of same-sex couples are more likely to make normal progress through school as the children of most other family structures.” And in the latest study by the University of Melbourne (Australia), researchers found that children raised by same-sex parents were actually “healthier and happier” than children in the general population.

In South Dakota, a religious teabagger emboldened by the midterm elections is pushing the idea that since “less than 3% of the population self-identifies as homosexual, they are not eligible to the same constitutional rights as others.” The teabagger, Bob Ellis, was livid that a federal court struck down the state’s ban on same-sex marriage and asserted that gay people “simply aren’t suited for marriage.” According to Ellis, “If these homosexuals want to enjoy the benefits of marriage and all the legal protections that come with it, they need to find a suitable marriage partner of the opposite sex and marry them. These activists have deliberately chosen NOT to do that.”

The religious coward failed to admit the dirty little secret that the real reason South Dakota banned same-sex marriage is borne of religion. In fact, Ellis claimed that “Contrary to the assertions of homosexual activists and activist judges, there are a multitude of scientific reasons to oppose acceptance of this behavior. They include: homosexual behavior is contrary to science. Homosexual behavior is contrary to nature. Homosexual behavior is aberrant (less than 3% of the population self-identifies as homosexual) and, homosexual behavior carries numerous and extreme risks.” Ellis failed to produce even one iota of research in the “multitude of scientific reasons” to oppose same-sex marriage because he is smart enough to avoid citing the bible as science. He is also smart enough to stop short of saying out loud that same-sex marriage should be banned because “god hates gays.”

According to one Republican in California, “it is state governors that are unfortunately allowing homosexual marriages. It is not good enough for governors to merely appeal to a higher court for unconstitutional opinions of bad judges.” The religious bigot had a better ‘constitutional’ solution that entails all governors “announcing that no homosexual marriage licenses will be issues, and no county clerk is permitted to issue marriage licenses to anyone other than a qualified man and woman.” To enforce the religious edict, the religious teabagger demanded that “each state governor use the state’s National Guard to enforce the same-sex marriage ban at county clerk’s offices.

Since Republicans gained ground in the midterm elections, many red states are boasting new “harsh religious liberty” legislation. Most of the ‘license to legally discriminate laws” are modeled after a rash of “bigotry legislation” that failed to reach fruition last year. However, in Indiana, evangelical Republicans have already drafted a particularly nasty “license to discriminate” bill founded on the Christian bible. This time, Republicans are not even concealing the purpose of the legislation they readily admit is giving religious bigots legal right “to refuse services to same-sex couples and ban adoption agencies from placing children with same-sex couples;” all under the guise of “defending freedom and protecting religious liberty.”

The Indiana bill uses language from the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) that was designed to prohibit the government from subverting the religious beliefs of citizens. Indiana’s bill allows the righteous to use religion to subvert the rights of other Americans. Since the bill is a state law, it supersedes any decent community’s nondiscrimination laws that protect LGBT people.

Ever since California’s same-sex marriage ban in 2008, there has been precious little, and likely no, politician, LGBT activist, or judge willing to acknowledge that all of the opposition to the gay community or same-sex marriage is founded in religion; primarily the Christian bible. That dirty little secret exposes the outright fear in this burgeoning theocracy of challenging the proponents of creating a religious state to mirror Iran, Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, or the growing Islamic State.

It is true that any kind of ban on the gay rights is a blatant violation of the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment, but few Americans even know the amendment exists, much less what it guarantees all citizens. However, most Americans understand the real and present danger of legislating and governing according to an archaic religious text. It is damn high time that politicians, LGBT activists, and judges start screaming that Republicans’ are attempting to abolish the Constitution because of the bible. Maybe then the anti-gay bigot class will climb back into their dirty little holes and stop persecuting American citizens; or as they call it “defending freedom and religious liberty.”

image: churchleaders

8 Replies to “America’s Dangerous Dirty Little Secret”

  1. Hardly a secret that America is full of ignorant bigots. After all, without them, FOX would be a cooking or travel channel.

  2. Why doesn’t every word of this apply to women.
    You can hide your sexuality in a closet.

    You can’t hide from gender. I tried. I hid behind military rank. Didn’t help.

    Why do my fertile eggs make me ‘Property of the State,’ as if my sole function is to give a random sperm the opportunity to fertilize one of the hundreds of eggs I carry?

    Because Abraham couldn’t grow sperm on his own. Yahweh couldn’t do it. He could ‘open a womb,’ but Hagar and Sarah did all the work. The Great Phallus (in various shades of pink and brown…) can’t ejaculate a human being.

    Control of people who CAN grow sperm is critical to the 3 Abrahamic religions – Islam, euro-Christianity, Judaism. The 3 stooges of Abraham.

  3. The other dirty little secret is that in matriarchal societies, the most powerful males are kept in check by fertility rituals.
    The king Must die.

    Not because female gods require blood sacrifice, but the hyper-aggressive males make more trouble than they are worth. Take the DNA and dispose of the actual king-of-the-hill.

    Just like a farmer killing an old rooster for the pot. Which is why Abrahamic religions have insisted on the erasure of females from authority. Women do what is needful for the general good. Men pass on sperm. And die.

    That is why the Abrahamic religions focus on post-death experience and anticipation. This life they are forced to share if they want immortality. Mono-gods HATE to share…

    Nature tends towards female dominance. Monotheistic gods are fading rapidly.

    This time, I hope we hit a balance and value everyone as humans, not appearance.

  4. Free exercise per the first amendment meant something very specific – that you cannot be barred from participating in religious worship of your choosing or be penalized for doing so. It is not license to discriminate against those who do not conform to your religious tenets.

  5. Gee, I guess my husbad screwed up when he married me. I can’t have children and since the whackjobs claim that marriage is only for procreation. I didn’t know I was supposed to die alone because my womb is barren. My bad!


  6. It is sad how our country has sunk to such low levels. Problem is,the Christian Right wi gers keep their noses stuck in the Ols Testament. They procreate to have more like minded followers. They perpetuate their false ideas for generations.
    I have seen same sex couples raise their children with love,caring and openess. Everyday I read about heterosexual couples abusing and killing their children but I have not seen that with same sex couples.
    We are not a nation of one religion. I remember very distinctly from History classes (long ago) that people came here for Religious Freedom. We all got along better until St. Ronnie decided to I fuse religion and Christianity into Politics. It played right into the Charleton Preachers ideas. We never had so many mega churches back then. We do not want a Theocracy and should not be forced into one,yet the right has decided that we will become one. The only thing we can do is vote against them.

  7. I believe Religion stifles freedom because it’s all about what you can’t have or can’t do. That said, everyone is free to have their lives governed by whatever sky-bot they may choose.
    If some one wants to pray, go for it. I won’t put them down but I don’t see the effect of it.
    I wish the GUV-MENT would stay out of the church and the church would stay out of the GUV-MENT.

Comments are closed.