GOP Anti-Abortion Language Threatens to Kill Human Trafficking Bill

Cornyn and McConnell

The Justice for Victims of Human Trafficking Act creates a fund for victims and provides grants to help local governments create programs that will benefit victims and prosecute human traffickers.  On its face, this is a bill that deserves the bipartisan support it had until Democrats found out that Republicans added Hyde Language (anti-abortion language) to the bill without their knowledge.  The problem is that Republicans did what Republicans do.  They said one thing and did another.  In this case, they said the Hyde Amendment would be excluded from this bill then they included it – without telling Democrats.

Moreover, Senator Dick Durbin says, the inclusion of the Hyde language is in direct contradiction to an agreement the two political parties made a year ago.

Senator Durbin told Politico: “there was a representation made”  that the Hyde language would be excluded from the bill.

Senator Chuck Schumer said  that a list of changes to the version of the trafficking bill that was passed in committee last year was provided to Senators.  Surprise!  The Hyde language wasn’t among those provisions. Somehow, it just popped into the law like magic.

Of course, John Cornyn insisted that Democrats are making much ado about nothing.  He also went on to suggest the language was always there, Democrats just didn’t notice it. Oh and besides, the Hyde language is standard stuff.

“All this does is maintain the status quo by making sure that this crime victims compensation fund, the funds available from that fund, are constrained by the same constraint that exists under all other federal law,”

However, as Democrats pointed out the inclusion of Hyde language in this case, actually amounts to a sneaky way of expanding restrictions on women’s reproductive rights, this time in the case of women and girls who were forced into sex slavery. One reason is money for the restitution fund comes from fines, not taxes.

However, there is another feature in this bill that, contrary to Cornyn’s claim is not about merely maintaining the status quo.  Cornyn’s bill authorizes the abortion restrictions for five years – without congressional review. Usually, when the Hyde Amended is attached to an appropriation bill, those are approved annually.

Nothing says let’s get the bad guys like forcing victims of human trafficking to bear children conceived through a sex crime with the added bonus of authorizing this restriction for five years.

It’s such a wonderful way to celebrate women’s history month too.

Democrats are less than pleased by the Republican deceptions. Though when we consider the fact that Republicans are now in the business of sabotaging sensitive diplomatic negotiations, this shouldn’t surprise anyone.  Ok, I digress.

A bill intended to help survivors of human trafficking, in fact, has the very real potential of hurting and possibly killing them because it denies them access to safe and legal abortions.

As Cecil Richards said: ”The majority of human trafficking victims are women and girls, and they need access to the full range of reproductive health care services without barriers.”

Senator Patty Murray described the Republican shenanigans as “shameful.”

Harry Reid, made it abundantly clear that Republicans are not going to get away with shafting victims of crime in the name of continuing their ideological war on women.

“You can blame it on staff, blame it on whoever you want to blame,” Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Tuesday. “But we didn’t know it was in the bill, and … the bill will not come off this floor as long as that language is in the bill.”

When the bill passed in committee last month, John Cornyn said the following:

“Too often we see partisan politics divide Congress, but today as we move forward with a bill to eliminate human trafficking, we see that doesn’t always have to be the case,”

Of course not, as long as Republican ideology comes first.  The fact is, Republicans can’t help themselves.  Their ideology will always be the first priority especially when it comes to women’s reproductive health.

14 Replies to “GOP Anti-Abortion Language Threatens to Kill Human Trafficking Bill”

  1. OK, riddle me this: How does abortion in any way, shape or form matter with human trafficking?

    It seems like they are two very opposite issues.

  2. “OK, riddle me this: How does abortion in any way, shape or form matter with human trafficking?”

    Well Dustin, by getting rid of abortion rights = more kids will be born. More kids that cannot be fed = more kids to be sold or stolen for use in human trafficking.

    Thus we see what “Pro-life’ really is all about: Insuring that there will always be cheap labor to be exploited or raped.

  3. I find it good to see that Congressional Democrats are remembering Republican Two-facedness enough to doublecheck anything that Republicans handle.

    A Scorpion will always be a Scorpion, whether it is out in the desert sun or riding on the back of a frog.

  4. Can The Republicans EVER do anything without putting their ideology first? just look at what they have done so far;

    Tried to force the President to accept the Keystone XL Pipeline, attached an amendment to the DHS funding attempting to kill the Presidents executive decision on immigration, embarrassed themselves by attempting to hide an invitation to the Israeli PM to speak before congress, disgraced and dishonored themselves by writing a letter threatening Iran that making any agreement with the President could/would be undone by the next president (they are assuming that that would be a Republican).

    Now, attempting to tell the victims of human trafficking that if they are, or get, pregnant, “Tough nuggies ladies, live with it. Just because you were kidnapped and repeatedly raped, you still have to bear the child.”

    What the hell is the matter with these people?

    Democrats, stand united. Please, do not let this garbage legislation pass.

  5. Am I the only one that wishes that Democrats would do something equally as underhanded as the Cons? I don’t know, maybe introduce an “Impeach Mitch McConnell” bill and sneak in an “anyone found voting against this bill hereby agrees to forfeit all salary and benefits for the remainder of their term.” Ooopsy.

  6. OK, I got it. Thanks Moongrim.

    Now that I get the gist of it, I think it’s highly cowardly of them to sneak in anti-abortion stuff into a bill that deals with human trafficking.

  7. About time some Democrats grow a pair. It almost seems like Senator Sanders has been the only one looking out for We The People lately, an Independent. The whole country needs to stand up to these dangerous radical right wing Republican/Tea Partiers. Patriots my a**!

  8. They always sneak something odious into a good bill. Always. I want to see from them in print or email why the hell they always do that!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.