As Clinton Cash Collapses A Defeated Fox News Gets Seriously Desperate

Transcript via Fox News Sunday:

fox news sunday clinton cash

Fox News is desperately trying to create a new Congressional investigation of Hillary Clinton even as Clinton Cash crumbles before their eyes.

Video:

Fox News Sunday’s interview of Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer, revealed their true agenda.
Transcript via Fox News Sunday:

WALLACE: There’s no indication that Hillary Clinton or Bill Clinton took direct action. I mean, it’s a coincidence or some could say it’s more than that, but you don’t have the direct action.

SCHWEIZER: Well, I think they discovered the direct action in those cases once law enforcement began the investigation. And that’s my point. My point, as I think you pointed out and I state clearly in the book — I don’t have subpoena power. I’m an author. I’m looking at pattern of behavior, and patterns of conduct of funds, and I’m saying this warrants further investigation.

….

WALLACE: For more on this, you can see the full documentary, “Fox News reporting: The Tangled Clinton Web” tonight at 10 p.m. Eastern on the Fox News Channel. But up next, reaction from Clinton insider, special counsel Lanny Davis, on whether Bill or Hillary Clinton did anything wrong.

It is obvious that the calls for investigation are part of a scheme to try to turn The Clinton Foundation into the issue that takes down Hillary Clinton. The New York Times and Washington Post foolishly gave the Clinton Cash book mainstream credibility, and now Fox News is calling on Republicans in Congress to investigate The Clinton Foundation.

Wallace’s interview of Schweizer exposed the political agenda behind Fox News. There was no pretense or facade of journalism. The Wallace interview was a shameless hype vehicle designed to press for another Congressional investigation of Hillary Clinton.

The wheels have come off of Clinton Cash, but that isn’t stopping Fox News from trying to do their part to get a Republican elected to be the next president.

Clinton Cash should look familiar because Republicans used the same tactics to try to get America interested in the Benghazi emails, but just like Benghazi, Clinton Cash is a scam.

Republicans can’t win on the issues, so they are trying to invent a scandal to destroy the woman who is the best candidate in either party. Clinton Cash is the same tired Republican tactics hidden behind a new fact free book.

The fact that Fox News is pushing so hard indicated that Republicans have already lost the war to create a new Hillary Clinton scandal.

32 Replies to “As Clinton Cash Collapses A Defeated Fox News Gets Seriously Desperate”

  1. The NY Times and the Washington Post needs to write a front page apology for giving this known liar a platform to spew utter bullshit.

    Will they do it? Is the moon made of green cheese

  2. And the GOP budget cuts the IRS and EPA budgets as well as a lot of other bad, even crazy, policy changes. The GOP budget: 27 million Americans lose healthcare coverage, 2 million kids lose education grants, 1.2 million women and kids no longer get food with their meals through WIC, $125 billion cut from food stamp program and millions of Americans including military families and veterans and the disabled go hungry but the 6,000 richest families in America save $269 billion by the repeal of the estate tax with no offsets and taxes are raised on the middle class. No one with 1/2 a brain supports these destructive, stupid and cruel ideas. Vote the GOP out.

  3. I wonder if Bill and Hillary CLinton will file slander charges against the author for not substantiating in his book this was all (BS) speculation without hard evidence. If they did it would really blow the minds of the RWNJ’s.

  4. SCHWEIZER was squirming… You obviously turned the Volume down or have a problem with words.. He was defending the Clinton cash cow.. and trying to change the subject..

  5. I was wondering that myself. Slander is slander. They should sue and give every single dime away to democrat candidates to beat the gotp’s. Use their money to beat them. Ironic.

  6. Get in line, we’re still waiting for the apology for their over blown fictional stories of Solyndra, IRS, birth cert., puff piece they did for Putin/Syria/CW..
    So good luck with that one..

  7. How many times has The Right Wing called wolf?

    Now, even if they did find something worthwhile- they’re long past anything resembling credibility.

  8. There may be hard evidence on Hillary if you don’t like circumstantial evidence. It would be in the form of written messages. It would be possibly found on Hillary’s server. The one she destroyed as soon as this hit the fan.

  9. If you perceived him to be squirming, it was probably because he was lying. Although he is probably a master at lying,( being a republican) I believe he just realized he craped in church. Hence the squirm.

  10. So there may be hard evidence but it was destroyed? So it’s equally possible there was no evidence and it was not destroyed, because there’s no proof either way. That’s what we’re talking about here. Proof not innuendo.

  11. Fine. Let Fox News and other right-wing trash heaps bring all of this out right now. That way, by the time Election Day rolls around, it will all be yesterday’s news, and then we can get onto the important business of electing her President.

  12. Correct. He is just an author with no subpoena power and those with subpoena power would use it wisely and not just on some coincidence and innuendo, but on hard facts. Then again, the Republican Congress is another story. They issue subpoenas at the drop of a hat when it is for an investigation of a political opponent, especially one who stands a good chance of blowing away any Republican candidate they put up. Benghazi II anyone?

  13. If, maybe, possibly, circumstantial, supposition, perhaps, conceivably, perchance, it could be: have never been viewed as standing a snowballs chance in a court of law.

    Which means if you do not have hard evidence, you have no evidence at all. But, of course when talking about TPGOPPERS and right-wing loons, thus even a maybe based on what they want seems like evidence to them.

  14. Actually, most court cases are prosecuted based on circumstancial evidence only. Rarely do you have an eyewitness or a photo showing the crime. Hillary had no reason to destroy her server but to destroy the “hard” evidence of her correspondence with…. well, we can’t know now can we? That may mean a court will never finally find her guilty, but it sure as hell doesn’t mean she’s innocent.

  15. Who Funds Peter Schweizer’s Government Accountability Institute?

    Discredited Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer is the president of the Government Accountability Institute (GAI), a conservative group with close ties to a billionaire family funding Sen. Ted Cruz’s presidential run. GAI has also received substantial support from groups backed by Charles and David Koch.

    Schweizer’s upcoming anti-Clinton book has garnered widespread media attention, despite the author’s long history of criticism from reporters for blatant errors, retractions, and reliance on sources that “do not exist.”
    Read More
    http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/04/21/who-funds-peter-schweizers-government-accountab/203355

  16. There’s no proof Hillary destroyed her server, other than she confessed to it. Do you care why she not only deleted her e-mails but destroyed her server so they could never be retrieved? Even by a court order? That doesn’t bother you at all?

  17. Lets move on to the story of congress members accepting money from Israeli concerns, then helping Israel in attempts to sabotage ongoing US negotiations and foreign policy.

  18. That does it! I’m going back to watching MSNBC.

    I’ll join the other 17 clueless individuals who tune into that channel.

    Pfft

  19. Every time the GOP tries to fabricate a Clinton conspiracy the Dems. need to put Sarah Palin in the spotlight. Keep her and Cruz talking and late night talk shows will have unlimited material for comedy.

  20. Yeah, and it’s not like there’s a Wrong-Winger who’s done worse, is it.
    Say….deleted 2,000,000 emails, or… took the whole computer to a crusher….

    Oh. Wait…

  21. I guess everyone forgot when Mit Romney was Governor of Mass. ,when his term ended, not only did he delete the govt. computers emails, he even took the government computers home!!/. As for Former NH Attorney General,Kelly Ayotte, during the FRM Ponzi scheme she also deleted on her Government computers all of her emails.and all of the rest of her emails.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.