Supreme Court Rejects Appeal To Restore North Carolina Pre-Abortion Ultrasound Law



On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear North Carolina’s appeal to restore a state law that would force a woman to view a sonogram of her fetus and to listen to a doctor describe the fetus in detail, before she would be permitted to have an abortion. The Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the appeal leaves in place an appeals court ruling that determined that North Carolina’s law violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

In the appeals court’s unanimous three judge ruling, Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III wrote on behalf of the court:

The state cannot commandeer the doctor-patient relationship to compel a physician to express its preference to the patient. This compelled speech, even though it is a regulation of the medical profession, is ideological in intent and in kind.


A number of medical professionals signed a brief urging the Supreme Court to reject the state’s appeal and uphold the lower court ruling. In their brief, the medical professionals stated:

The state requires physicians to recite the state’s message even when the patient physically avoids seeing or hearing it. That is farce, not informed consent, and it demonstrates beyond any doubt that the requirement is an impermissible attempt to use physicians to spread the state’s ideological message. The First Amendment simply does not allow that result.

The conservative-leaning Supreme Court apparently agreed and refused to consider the appeal. Judge Antonin Scalia dissented from his colleagues, but aside from Scalia, no other justice agreed to hear the case.

The Supreme Court’s decision not to revive North Carolina’s ultrasound law is a small, but significant victory for reproductive rights in the United States. Republican dominated lawmakers will continue to write laws in many states that infringe upon a woman’s right to choose. However, many of those laws are so blatantly ideological that they run afoul of the Bill of Rights. Republican lawmakers in North Carolina, and in many other red states, have become so extreme that even the right-wing U.S. Supreme Court recognizes they are trampling upon the constitutional rights of pregnant women.

11 Replies to “Supreme Court Rejects Appeal To Restore North Carolina Pre-Abortion Ultrasound Law”

  1. Republican state legislators continually seek new opportunities to be SPANKED by the court system for their incredibly invasive and empathy-devoid, wholly self-serving, and blatantly unconstitutional policy proposals and legislative offerings.

    This time, their repeated attempts to mandate that women seeking an abortion be subjected to emotional intimidation has been soundly thwarted by the SCOTUS.

    The GOP’s response: “Thank you, may I have another?”

  2. Scalia was the only dissenter? I would have thought his buddy Thomas at least would have thrown his ideological beliefs in. Maybe there is some hope for SCOTUS after all.

  3. A Farce- indeed. And this sets a precedent. But expect the Anti-choicers to conjure up another angle in their ceaseless efforts to deny women their rights.

    And I concur- Scalia is a Farce.

  4. How about giving a man a sonogram before he ever gets Viagra or any other drug for use for the same reason or buying any other object to prevent a birth?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.