Ranking Member of the House Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff (D-CA) speaks after U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions attended a closed door interview with the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol in Washington, U.S., November 30, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said that Trump has undermined national security and made a historic mistake by withdrawing from the Iran deal.
In a statement provided to PoliticusUSA, Rep. Schiff said:
The decision by President Trump to withdraw the United States from the Iran nuclear deal will undermine our national security, increase the prospect of a nuclear Iran or conflict with that nation, and cause other countries to conclude that America does not keep its word. Scuttling an agreement that had halted the Iranian nuclear program and put in place an intrusive regimen of inspections without a credible Plan B is a mistake of historic proportions. The IAEA and our Intelligence Community has repeatedly confirmed that Tehran is in compliance with the deal, and the President takes this action against the appeals of our closest allies, senior members of Congress in both parties, and many of his own advisors. The President’s willingness to shatter the international consensus, forged over years of arduous negotiations, on how to constrain Iran’s nuclear program only makes sense as part of a campaign to erase his predecessor’s legacy, regardless of the consequences to our national security.
When I endorsed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action in 2015, I did so fully cognizant of the agreement’s limitations, including the degree to which the restrictions on Iran’s enrichment of uranium decrease over the duration of the deal. But the deal’s virtues always outweighed its shortcomings and, while Tehran could never be trusted, the JCPOA’s provisions were drafted with exactly that premise in mind, putting in place an inspections regime that Secretary Mattis recently described as ‘robust.’ Under monitoring by international inspectors, Iran has eliminated virtually all of its enriched uranium, destroyed the core of its heavy-water reactor, and removed more than 13,000 centrifuges and placed them under international monitoring. All of that hard won process is now in jeopardy.
Iran will be faced with a choice of whether to stay in the deal despite our violation of its terms, or to withdraw and reinstall the centrifuges that have been mothballed since 2015. As we await the Iranian and European response to U.S. withdrawal, there is no question that in taking this action unilaterally, we have isolated ourselves and weakened our credibility on the world stage in a way that will be difficult to repair. Should a subsequent administration seek to achieve a new agreement restricting Iran’s nuclear program, why should other nations assume it will persist beyond the next election?
Nor will the damage be confined to the Middle East alone. The Administration’s ability to secure a comprehensive and workable deal with North Korea’s dictator, Kim Jong-Un, has now become even more difficult. A denuclearization agreement with the North Korean, with its sizable and secretive nuclear arsenal and ICBM capabilities, would have been enormously difficult under any circumstances, but what incentive does Pyongyang now have in signing on to any agreement knowing that the United States could unilaterally renege at any point in this Administration or the next?
In 2015, as Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium grew ever larger, Congress was faced with the choice of approving or disapproving the JCPOA, and we had to consider whether there was any better alternative. We could find none. The sanctions regime that brought Iran to the negotiating table could not be maintained indefinitely, and if there was to be a peaceful route to preventing Iran from racing towards a nuclear arsenal, an international consensus was vital. Listening to President Trump, it is clear that there is no more of an alternative today than there was in 2015, and all the President has to offer is the hope that tough talk will be enough to avert catastrophe. That is not a strategy or a plan, but a dangerous abdication of responsibility for our nation’s security.
Schiff was right on all points. Trump’s actions today undermine national security, US credibility, and have further isolated us from the rest of the world. If Putin had a wishlist, Trump just made it all come true.
A man who promised to make American great again has made the country weaker than it has been since World War II.
For more discussion about this story join our Rachel Maddow and MSNBC group.
Jason is the managing editor. He is also a White House Press Pool and a Congressional correspondent for PoliticusUSA. Jason has a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science. His graduate work focused on public policy, with a specialization in social reform movements.
Awards and Professional Memberships
Member of the Society of Professional Journalists and The American Political Science Association
Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) has been released from the hospital. The senator is back in…
A judge has rejected Fox News's argument that they are protected by the First Amendment…
Sen. Lindsey Graham appears to be struggling with Donald Trump's criminal indictment as he advised…
The thing former President Donald Trump has feared for more than four decades has happened,…
Trump's lawyer Joe Tacopina said that Trump was shocked that he was indicted, but there…
As President Biden departed the White House on Marine One Friday morning, reporters tried over…
This website uses cookies.