By David Morgan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Donald Trump‘s Justice Department is unlikely to grant Democrats in Congress access to underlying evidence from Special Counsel ‘s probe of Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election, a top congressional Republican said on Friday.
If Representative Doug Collins is right, Democratic-led congressional committees that have launched their own probes of Trump may be stuck with a Mueller investigation report that serves more as a general guidebook than a detailed roadmap of Russian interference and any Trump campaign collusion.
Democrats, who control the House of Representatives, want congressional investigators to have access to Mueller’s grand jury evidence and other information from the probe, fearing that Attorney General William Barr could release only a summary of Mueller’s report.
To get more stories like this, subscribe to our newsletter The Daily.
But Collins, the senior Republican on the House Judiciary Committee who met with Barr last week, told reporters that he expects any effort by Democrats to obtain such data from the Justice Department to end up in court, unless Mueller finds that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.
“They have never released it, and we don’t expect that to happen again now,” said Collins.
The Mueller report, Washington‘s most eagerly anticipated tome in years, is expected soon. Barr must decide what to do with it, a major test for the new Justice Department chief.
Democrats want access to the underlying evidence because of concern that Barr could withhold any incriminating information about Trump. Justice Department policy does not allow a sitting president to be indicted, but also avoids releasing evidence of misconduct against individuals who have not been charged.
“We do not believe there’s going to be collusion,” Collins added. “There’s no more indictments coming from this that we’ve seen so far.”
He said he also does not expect the probes, such as the one in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Manhattan. But could share national security-related classified information with Congress, he added.report to discuss related, ongoing federal
Collins said his meeting with Barr showed that the two agree on what the law says about what can be released from the probe. “He said he wants to make as much available as he possibly can,” Collins said. “But he’s also going to be a very firm attorney general … and he’ll stay within the guidelines.”
Justice Department officials and Democratic congressional committee staffers were not immediately available for comment.
Since May 2017, Russia in the presidential election that put Trump in the White House, whether Trump colluded with Moscow and whether he has since tried to obstruct subsequent investigations.has been looking into interference by
The Kremlin denies U.S. intelligence agencies‘ findings that it meddled in the election. Trump denies collusion and obstruction, often calling the probe a “witch hunt.”
When Congress likely will not be notified immediately, Collins said.reports to Barr, as required under law,
On Monday, House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler launched a broad investigation into possible obstruction of justice and corruption by Trump and his associates. The probe is aimed at a range of issues from possible campaign finance law violations to alleged contacts between the Trump campaign and Russians.
On Friday, Republicans countered by releasing the transcript of closed-door testimony by a career Justice Department official from 2018, which they said supports their contention of anti-Trump activities among department officials in 2016.
Collins said he intends to release more testimony in future, adding that the committee has about 20 transcripts in total.
(Reporting by David Morgan; editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and James Dalgleish)
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) refused to investigate Jared Kushner taking billions of dollars from Saudi…
Stephen Colbert called out the media for mostly ignoring the fact that House Republicans are…
A judge has ordered that Donald Trump be removed from the ballot in Illinois and…
There is no reason for the Supreme Court to hear Trump's immunity claim. Four probably…
Trump has lost his appeal as a judge has ruled that he must come up…
In a new court filing, Trump's lawyers admitted that he was willing to post a…