By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Supreme Court made it clear on Monday that the U.S. Constitution does not guarantee a prisoner sentenced to capital punishment “a painless death,” paving the way for the execution of a convicted murderer who sought to die by lethal gas rather than lethal injection because of a rare medical condition.
Russell Bucklew, 50, had argued that lethal injection might inflict undue agony by rupturing blood-filled tumors on his body caused by a congenital condition called cavernous hemangioma in violation of the Constitution’s Eighth Amendment, which bars cruel and unusual punishment.
In a decision written by conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch, the court ruled 5-4 that Bucklew had failed to present enough evidence for them to let him ask a lower court to allow him to be executed by lethal gas. The court’s five conservatives were in the majority and its four liberals dissented.
Referencing the history of capital punishment, Gorsuch wrote that “the Eighth Amendment does not guarantee a prisoner a painless death – something that, of course, isn’t guaranteed to many people, including most victims of capital crimes.”
Monday’s ruling was in line with a decision from 2015 in which the court rejected a challenge to Oklahoma’s method of execution by lethal injection on a 5-4 vote. In that case, the court held that inmates challenging a method of execution had to come up with an alternative option that was less painful.
There was no evidence that Bucklew’s chosen alternative – lethal gas – would be any less painful, said Gorsuch, who was appointed to the court by President Donald Trump in 2017.
Gorsuch noted that Bucklew is awaiting execution for crimes committed more than two decades ago.
“Yet since then, he has managed to secure delay through lawsuit after lawsuit,” Gorsuch wrote.
The case did not challenge the constitutionality of the death penalty itself as a violation of the Eighth Amendment. The court has curbed the death penalty as applied to juveniles and mentally disabled people, but there are no signs that the conservative majority is inclined to find that capital punishment is unlawful.
‘NO CONSTITUTIONAL WAY’
Liberal Justice Stephen Breyer in a dissenting opinion repeated his assertion first raised in the 2015 case that if prisoners cannot be executed quickly without violating their rights “it may be that … there simply is no constitutional way to implement the death penalty.”
In Missouri, execution is authorized using either injection or gas but the state in practice uses only lethal injection.
Bucklew’s appeal neither contested his guilt nor sought to avoid execution. Lawyers for the state have said that although lethal gas is authorized, it has never been used and there are no protocols for it.
The high court in March 2018 blocked Bucklew’s execution on a 5-4 vote, with four of the court’s five conservative justices voting to deny the request. The conservative justice who voted with the court’s four liberals to grant the stay, Anthony Kennedy, has since retired and was replaced by President Donald Trump’s appointee Brett Kavanaugh.
Bucklew was convicted of the 1996 murder in southeastern Missouri of Michael Sanders, who was living with Bucklew’s former girlfriend Stephanie Ray at the time. Bucklew fatally shot Sanders at his trailer home, kidnapped and raped Ray, shot at Sanders’ 6-year-old son and wounded a police officer before being apprehended, according to court papers.
Bucklew’s condition has caused large, blood-filled tumors to grow on his face, head, neck and throat, according to court papers.
The Supreme Court last week blocked the execution of a Texas inmate whose request that his Buddhist spiritual adviser be present at the execution had been denied by the state..
That came just weeks after the court rejected on a 5-4 vote a similar request from a Muslim inmate in Alabama, saying he had waited too long to file his lawsuit.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)