Featured News

Stacey Abrams Is Planning To Get Around The Filibuster To Protect Voting Rights

Last updated on March 13th, 2021 at 05:57 am

Stacey Abrams thinks moderate Senate Democrats will be on board with exempting voting rights legislation from the filibuster rules.

Abrams told Mother Jones, “The judicial appointment exception, the Cabinet appointment exception, the budget reconciliation exception, are all grounded in this idea that these are constitutionally prescribed responsibilities that should not be thwarted by minority imposition,” she says. “And we should add to it the right to protect democracy. It is a foundational principle in our country. And it is an explicit role and responsibility accorded only to Congress in the elections clause in the Constitution.”

The Abrams plan is for Democrats to use the filibuster exemption narrowly on voting rights bills like the For The People Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Act. Democrats in the Senate universally support the voting rights bills, and there is universal consensus on changing the filibuster rules without gutting the filibuster.

To get more stories like this, subscribe to our newsletter The Daily.

It is a simple change that would allow the filibuster to stay and voting rights to be protected.

The timing of the move will be the big question for Democrats. State Republicans around the country are trying to pass massive voter suppression bills. There are bills in 42 states to limit the right to vote. Democrats would be best served strategically by letting Republicans pass their bills, then passing legislation to protect voting rights because it would give Republicans less time to challenge the legislation in court before the 2022 election.

The John Lewis Voting Rights Act will give the DOJ the power to fully prosecute voting rights cases again, and The For The People Act is the biggest protection of voting rights since the Civil Rights Act of 1965.
Senate Democrats can pass voting rights legislation and keep the filibuster. The question is not if they should do it, but when.

For more discussion about this story join our Rachel Maddow and MSNBC group.

Follow and Like PoliticusUSA on Facebook.

Recent Posts

Donald Trump Has A Massive Pennsylvania Problem

The Pennsylvania presidential primary didn't have any contested contests, but Trump managed to lose nearly…

7 hours ago

As Trump Freezes In Court, Biden Rips Him In Florida

President Biden blasted Trump for taking away reproductive freedom as the former president/criminal defendant complained…

15 hours ago

The Hush Money Trial Is Breaking Donald Trump

Trump broke down over the gag order and ranted about how cold the courtroom is,…

17 hours ago

Just 1 Protester Shows Up To Support Trump At Manhattan Court

Trump is angry that no one is showing up to support him at his criminal,…

18 hours ago

Judge Tells Trump’s Lawyer He’s Losing All Credibility with the Court

Donald Trump's lawyers couldn't defend their client's actions, so they resorted to claiming that it…

21 hours ago

Trump Is Throwing A Fit Because He Thinks Cops Are Scaring Away His MAGA Protesters

Before the gag order violation hearing, Trump went on a political rant because he was…

22 hours ago