Categories: Featured News

Judge Rules Against DACA But Congress Still Has DREAM Act

Published by

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals was a key federal program protecting Dreamers. (To appease the AP: “Dreamers” are often the title for DACA recipients,  from Sen Dick Durbin’s DREAM Act.)

On Friday, a judge ruled against it, staying the admission of new applicants. This comes after years of Congress sitting on legislation that could avoid this problem.

Activists and DACA recipients march up Broadway during the start of their ‘Walk to Stay Home,’ a five-day 250-mile walk from New York to Washington D.C., to demand that Congress pass a Clean Dream Act, in Manhattan, New
York, U.S., February 15, 2018. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

These groups have been waiting for years on a path to citizenship, through revolving doors. Today, over 600,000 DACA recipients now face challenges to their status, the question remains.

Where is Congress?

The DREAM Act is one of many pieces of legislation that so often finds a challenge in the Senate. Since its inception, Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois has brought it to the Senate Floor.  In every session, along with attempts to improve immigration processes in the United States, Senate Democrats have pressed on this issue.

As Presidents and judges have come and gone, DACA has been a revolving door. Its status as a federal program has been a point of contention, with some believing that it shouldn’t exist at all.

Even though it serves a population nearly the size of DC that have lived their lives in the United States. 


Dreamers hold jobs, space, and pay taxes in their communities. Yet federal executive and judicial voices continue to be the only players. DACA recipients still don’t hold a path to citizenship and renewal in the program only ensures that they won’t be deported.

Senators have pointed to the need for DACA recipients; Dreamers to find codification in law.

Moving forward, they need access to full citizenship, along with the rights and privileges that some resident aliens achieve after living in the US for 3 years.

Moreover, my reporting has pointed to one thing every time: Dreamers need the protection of federal legislation. Changing administrations and judicial appointments can be detrimental to an executive program or any executive action.

Federal legislation, however, can consistently have a long-term impact on DACA recipients. With a bill, legal challenges shift from questions of executive authority.

It doesn’t offer holistic protection — some thought the Voting Rights Act would make it through the Supreme Court — but it does offer some.


Ana Navarro said it best: “It’s way past time for Congress to show some damn [backbone] and act!”

Published by

Recent Posts

Opinion: Religious Leaders Concur – No Religious Exemption For COVID-19 Vaccine

The problem for the growing anti-vaxxer cult, however, is that nearly all major religions, including…

2 hours ago

Pelosi And Schumer Turn The Heat Up On Mitch McConnell With Debt Limit CR

Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Schumer announced a continuing resolution that will suspend the debt…

4 hours ago

Watch Jen Psaki Do Her Thing And Wreck Peter Doocy’s Haitians/COVID False Equivalency

Jen Psaki saw what Peter Doocy was trying to do with a question about Haitian…

7 hours ago

Republicans Busted In Text Messages Admitting Election Laws Have Nothing To Do With Fraud

Text messages obtained in a lawsuit related to Florida's election reform law revealed that the…

8 hours ago

More Criminal Charges Expected Against Trump Org CFO Allen Weisselberg

Former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg's attorneys are expecting that more criminal charges will be…

9 hours ago

Texas Abortion Law Backfires On Republicans As SCOTUS Has A Negative Approval Rating

The American people overwhelmingly oppose the Texas abortion law, and the Supreme Court now has…

10 hours ago

This website uses cookies.