The Lincoln Project republicans came out in full force last December, declaring in a New York Times op-ed their mission of defeating both Trump this November as well as Trumpism, meaning they are seeking to erase the republican majority in the senate.
By letting Republicans take control of over two-thirds of state governments over the past ten years Democrats have placed themselves on the outside of the all-important process of drawing congressional districts. This of course has allowed GOP gerrymandering to take place at the federal and state level. The result of that has been that the minority Republican Party controls the government while the majority Democratic Party controls nothing except a few state governments.
If Democrats are successful this year, however, they will be able to reverse many years of losses that have cost them power and given conservatives free rein in areas that should be controlled by Democrats.
Right now it looks like Democrats may be able to flip over 300 legislative seats currently held by Republicans. This would give them control of six to eight state legislative chambers. It may not be enough to re-take all the GOP dominated state governments, but it would be a great start.
There is one group focused on this effort, called the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee (DLCC). Their sole purpose is to elect Democrats to state legislatures.
“We are not afraid of this fight. We took it on in 2017 and we’ll take it on again in 2018,” DLCC executive director Jessica Post said on Thursday.
Post maintains that Democrats today have a great chance to take over control of the state Senate in New York, Colorado, Maine, Wisconsin, Arizona and New Hampshire, and state Houses in Minnesota, Iowa and Michigan, among other places.
She said that the party has already “flipped” 44 legislative seats in off-year and special elections since the 2016 elections. This includes a victory in Washington state last year that put the state Senate under Democratic control. Democrats now control the entire state government of Washington.
Legislative gains on Tuesday would help Democrats lay the groundwork for even more gains in the 2020 elections. When they take over governorships and state legislatures it helps give them at least partial control over the congressional redistricting process which will occur after the 2020 census.
Democrats were devastated after the midterm elections of 2010, the last census year. This shut them out of the redistricting process in many states and allowed Republican gerrymandering to take place. This in turn gave Republicans control of the U.S. House of Representatives for eight years.
Republican governors and state governments have also engaged in aggressive voter suppression tactics that further solidified their hold on power even though they are the minority party.
GOP governmental policies in the states have also hurt labor unions, which historically have been a big source of campaign cash and “get out the vote” efforts for Democrats.
Tim Waters, political director of the United Steelworkers union, said this about what happened to unions:
“These weren’t your granddaddy’s Republicans. The first thing they did is try to get their boot on our throat, because they see unions as the thing standing between them and their unfettered agenda.”
Republican state governments have routinely passed right-to-work laws, which prohibit unions from requiring dues payment from workers they represent.
The DLCC has long been overlooked but this year they have attracted a great deal of attention. They’ve had a great fundraising cycle also, and have spent a record $35 million on state legislative races.
The Democratic Governors Association also raised a record $121 million this cycle, and put them in a strong position to take back six governorships currently held by Republicans.
On top of that, the National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC) a group founded by former Attorney General Eric Holder, raised nearly $11 million in 2017. Their goal has been to give Democrats more influence in the post-2020 redistricting processes.
NDRC employs a multi-faceted approach that has included lawsuits and ballot initiatives. It is also spending $750,000 on a field organizing effort with For Our Future, a joint venture of organized labor and liberal billionaire
Yesterday a three-judge federal panel ruled that Republican-drawn congressional districts in North Carolina have been gerrymandered in such a way that they violate the United States Constitution. The panel held that the districts were established by the GOP legislature for the purpose of favoring Republicans over Democrats, which is not a valid reason for delineating congressional districts.
WE WIN! Three-judge federal court — in light of the #SCOTUS decision in Gill — again strikes down North Carolina's Congressional map as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. https://t.co/bi6ngEf4AE pic.twitter.com/dZbxQsp4K7
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of a gerrymandered congressional district map in North Carolina which was supported by the state’s Republican Party, overturning a lower court’s ruling which had said the map was unconstitutional. The ruling was considered a major setback for North Carolina’s Democratic Party.
Simply put, “partisan gerrymandering” is a rebrand of “race based gerrymandering.” Republicans are trying to find the magic words to suppress votes by people who are more likely to vote for Democrats.
On October 3, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case that could deem “partisan gerrymandering” constitutional.
Democrats are projected to win more than 54% of the vote in the 2018 House elections, but only pick up 12 seats thanks to heavily gerrymandered Congressional districts.
The Obama backed, and Eric Holder chaired, National Democratic Redistricting Committee has raised $10.8 million in six months in their effort to combat Republican election rigging through gerrymandering.
The Supreme Court decided to hear a case that will determine if gerrymandering for partisan benefit is constitutional. This will be the landmark case that either shuts down Republican cheating or allows Republicans to use DeVos math to win elections.
This case provides the Court with the opportunity to rule in favor of free and fair elections.
Sasha Grodsky of Patriotic Millionaires said in a statement to politicusUSA:
We are hopeful that the decision to hear this case will be the first step in addressing the partisan gerrymandering that is currently shaping the House of Representatives as well as state legislatures across the country. Partisan gerrymandering has distorted our political system and disenfranchised voters for far too long. It is time for the Supreme Court to declare that it is wrong when a majority of the voters in a state favor one set of policies, but partisan district boundaries mean that a majority of their representatives are opposed to those policies. Too many Americans have had the key to their power—their votes—stolen by the very system that was instituted to secure their rights.
By ruling that Arizona's Independent Redistricting Commission is constitutional, the Supreme Court of the United States kicked plutocrat-loving, election rigging, gerrymandering Republicans in the gut.
In a ruling on attorney's fees related to a redistricting case, a Federal Court Judge dealt Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott two doses of humiliation.
On Wednesday, the Michigan State Senate passed a bill that requires a woman to purchase separate health insurance prior to getting an abortion.
In reality the future of the Voting Rights Act depends on whether Justice Kennedy places a higher priority on states' rights, or the rights of millions of Americans to vote.
Bitter old white male that he is, even John McCain knows immigration reform is not an option. You can either try and grow more fingers to plug up the cracks in the dike or you can learn how to swim
Like every dirty trick Republicans use to steal elections, the American Legislative Exchange Council is behind Electoral College rigging efforts in blue states that overwhelmingly voted for Obama.
Will Republicans use the redistricting advantages they achieved after their 2010 sweep to change the way electoral votes are apportioned?