Featured News

Trump Suffers A Big Loss In Emoluments Clause Lawsuit

(Reuters) – A federal judge on Wednesday rejected U.S. President Donald Trump’s latest effort to dismiss a lawsuit accusing him of unconstitutionally doing business with foreign governments while occupying the White House.

Don't Miss Sarah Jones's Essay On Kristi Noem Titled Predatory Is The Point On The Daily.

U.S. District Judge Peter Messitte in Greenbelt, Maryland said the attorneys general of Maryland and the District of Columbia, Brian Frosh and Karl Racine, had plausibly alleged that Trump’s activity violated the Constitution’s “emoluments” clause.

That clause bars U.S. officials from accepting various gifts from foreign governments without congressional approval, and is designed to thwart corruption and improper influence.

Messitte had in March narrowed the lawsuit to focus on profits stemming from Trump’s ownership, through the Trump Organization, of the Trump International Hotel in Washington, a popular spot for foreign officials.

“We continue to maintain that this case should be dismissed, a position that was shared by a New York court in a related case,” Andy Reuss, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of Justice, said in an email. “The Justice Department is reviewing the order and determining next steps to continue vigorously defending the President.”

Reuss was referring to the dismissal last December of a lawsuit by plaintiffs including the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a nonprofit watchdog. The judge in that case held that the plaintiffs lacked legal standing to bring the lawsuit.

In his 52-page decision, Messitte rejected what he called Trump’s “cramped” view that the clause was essentially limited to bribes, and said the plaintiffs had “convincingly argued” that it had a broader meaning.

Racine tweeted after the decision: “We are one step closer to stopping President Trump from violating the Constitution’s original anti-corruption provisions.”

Frosh’s office had no immediate comment.

Roughly 200 U.S. senators and representatives, all Democrats, filed a related lawsuit against Trump in June 2017, demanding that he obtain congressional approval before accepting emoluments. The judge in that case has not ruled on its merits.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by James Dalgleish and Steve Orlofsky)

Recent Posts

“Trump Is F-ed:” A Day Full Of Damaging Evidence At Hush Money Trial

Witnesses have offered testimony that Trump was trying to hide damaging information from voters and…

4 mins ago

Trump Removes Truth Social Posts After Being Threatened With Jail

After being threatened with potential jail time, Donald Trump removed posts from Truth Social that…

1 hour ago

Marjorie Taylor Greene Called On To Resign After Democrats Humiliate Her

Marjorie Taylor Greene was called on to resign from Congress after Democrats took away her…

2 hours ago

Judge Threatens Trump With Incarceration If He Continues To Violate Gag Order

Judge Merchan wrote in a gag order ruling that he would incarcerate Trump if the…

6 hours ago

Rachel Maddow: Trump Is Quarterbacking A National GOP Crime Scandal

Rachel Maddow showed that Trump is leading the Republican Party through a national crime scandal.

17 hours ago

Democrats May Block Marjorie Taylor Greene From Ousting Mike Johnson

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said that a group of Democrats might block Rep. Majorie Taylor…

18 hours ago