Featured News

Prosecutors violated Victims Rights Act in deal for Florida financier Epstein: judge

Last updated on February 24th, 2019 at 04:34 am

Read: Samuel Alito Is The Insurrectionist Threat To Democracy On The Supreme Court

By Brendan Pierson

NEW YORK (Reuters) – A 2007 agreement by U.S. federal prosecutors not to charge Florida financier Jeffrey Epstein with sex trafficking of minors violated the legal rights of Epstein’s alleged victims by keeping them in the dark, a federal judge ruled on Thursday.

U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra in West Palm Beach, Florida, ruled the prosecutors violated the federal Crime Victims’ Rights Act by not letting more than 30 identified victims know of the deal so they would have a chance to oppose it.

Under his deal, Epstein pleaded guilty to a lesser Florida state felony prostitution charge and served 13 months in prison. He was also required to register as a sex offender.

The ruling came in a civil lawsuit filed by two of the alleged victims against the government in 2008 to challenge the non-prosecution agreement.

“The vindication the victims received today is the reason we have fought for their rights for more than 10 years,” said Brad Edwards, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, in an email.

It was not immediately clear what effect the ruling would have. Marra did not order any remedy, instead ordering the plaintiffs and the government to notify him within 15 days how they wished to proceed in determining a remedy.

Marra noted in his opinion that in at least one past case, a court had rescinded a non-prosecution agreement after finding that it was reached in violation of the victims’ legal rights.

Alex Acosta, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida in 2007 and now U.S. Secretary of Labor in the Trump administration, was among the prosecutors who made the agreement.

A Labor Department spokeswoman said the decisions of the U.S. Attorney’s office under Acosta had been approved by U.S. Justice Department leadership and the Justice Department had defended them in court. She declined further comment.

A lawyer for Epstein could not immediately be reached for comment.

Before reaching the non-prosecution agreement with Acosta’s office, Epstein was facing potential federal indictment for sexually abusing dozens of girls as young as 14 between 1999 and 2007, directing others to abuse them and paying employees to bring victims to him, according to court filings.

Epstein has said that his encounters with alleged victims were consensual and that he believed they were 18 when they occurred.

Marra said prosecutors not only failed to tell known victims about the deal, as required by law, but also chose to “mislead the victims to believe that federal prosecution was still a possibility” by urging them to be “patient” even after the deal was reached.

(Reporting by Brendan Pierson in New York; Editing by Howard Goller and Leslie Adler)

Recent Posts

Trump Demands Case Be Dismissed As He Whines About Being Cold

Donald Trump must think that being the GOP nominee makes him immune from prosecution, as…

1 hour ago

Trump’s Defense Case Implodes As Witness Robert Costello Gets Reprimanded By Judge

Trump's defense witness Robert Costello was turning red in the face and muttering his breath…

3 hours ago

Trump Appears To Be Spending Most Of His Day In Court Asleep

Donald Trump can't seem to stay awake during his trial, and multiple reporters have noted…

6 hours ago

Terrible News For Trump As Closing Arguments Delayed In Criminal Trial

Judge Merchan brought the parties into court early on Monday, and said that due to…

10 hours ago

Marco Rubio Melts Down As His Election Lies Get Debunked On Meet The Press

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) refused to commit to accepting the 2024 election results then melted…

1 day ago

Rep. Jasmine Crockett Outs Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Racism On National TV

Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) explained on CNN why Marjorie Taylor Greene's attack on her was…

1 day ago