Shady SCOTUS Majority Hides The Vote On Jack Smith Rejection

Last updated on January 2nd, 2024 at 11:15 am

Don't Miss Sarah Jones's Essay On Kristi Noem Titled Predatory Is The Point On The Daily.

A Supreme Court that is struggling with a loss of credibility made the decision to not disclose what the vote was to reject Jack Smith’s request for a ruling on Trump’s immunity claim.

NBC News’s Lisa Rubin posted:

It is a strange decision, to say the least, for the Court not to disclose whether the vote was 9-0, 6-3, or 5-4. The Court issued its decision as most of the country is preparing for the holiday season with a single sentence.

Trump’s immunity claim will eventually make it to the Supreme Court, but the big question is when? Trump is trying to delay his trial through Election Day 2024, and without the Supreme Court providing any information about why they made the decision that they did, it only serves to undermine their credibility even more.

The decision looks shady based on the lack of information released, and the perception advances the idea that the current Supreme Court majority views itself as accountable to no one, including the American people.

A Special Message From PoliticusUSA

If you are in a position to donate purely to help us keep the doors open on PoliticusUSA during what is a critical election year, please do so here.

We have been honored to be able to put your interests first for 14 years as we only answer to our readers and we will not compromise on that fundamental, core PoliticusUSA value.

[paypal-donation]

Jason Easley

Jason is the managing editor. He is also a White House Press Pool and a Congressional correspondent for PoliticusUSA. Jason has a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science. His graduate work focused on public policy, with a specialization in social reform movements.

Awards and  Professional Memberships

Member of the Society of Professional Journalists and The American Political Science Association