Categories: Featured News

Nader Wins First Amendment Ballot Access Case

ImageThe Supreme Court today declined to hear an appeal of a case brought by Ralph Nader against the state of Arizona, and its law requiring Independent candidates to register earlier than candidates affiliated with the two political parties.

Nader originally challenged the law by saying that it violated his First Amendment rights, and his right to freedom of association. The district court originally declared the law constitutional, but this decision was overruled by the Ninth Circuit. Nader’s legal team argued that the law which required Independent candidates to register in June was unconstitutional due to the fact that the two political parties don’t hold their conventions until the fall. Thirteen other states adopted a law similar to the Arizona law, and 15 other states have ballot access cases pending.

Nader’s attorney Robert Bernhoft said, “By letting that decision stand, the U.S. Supreme Court has affirmed that American democracy hinges on giving people a voice and a choice. Today’s decision is not only a victory for Ralph Nader, but a seminal victory for all who care about free speech, free and open elections, and a more participatory democracy.”

“What makes this case unusually significant is that it involved two distinct, important issues, and liberalized ballot access prevailed on both,” says Richard Winger, editor of the Ballot Access News. For as much as Democrats mock and complain about Nader’s presidential candidacies, he is willing to fight for an open democracy, even when this assuredly doesn’t make him the most popular person in the room. Both Democrats and Republicans have supported laws like the one in Arizona. They would love nothing more than to legally become a closed two party system.

If the Arizona law would have been found constitutional, it would have set a dangerous precedent. If states were allowed to set different registration deadlines for different candidates, then it could set up barriers to restrict the entry of certain candidates into the process. When ballot access is restricted the voice of the people is muted and our democracy is neutered. Our political system needs to be opened not closed, and whether one likes Ralph Nader or not, he has used his career to fight battles that benefit his nation. To me, this is the definition of a true patriot.

Recent Posts

Rachel Maddow Slays Bothsidesism

Rachel Maddow took on the lazy thinking and punditry that both the Democratic and Republican…

8 hours ago

Matt Gaetz Files Motion To Vacate To Oust Kevin McCarthy

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) has followed through and filed a motion to vacate against Speaker…

11 hours ago

The Lincoln Project Runs Ad At Manhattan Courthouse and Trump Tower Calling Trump A Broke Loser

The Lincoln Project is running a new ad at the Manhattan courthouse and Trump Tower…

12 hours ago

Chaos In The House As Matt Gaetz Accuses Kevin McCarthy Of A Secret Deal With Democrats

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) is now accusing Speaker Kevin McCarthy of negotiating a secret side…

15 hours ago

An Enraged Trump Just Had An Epic Meltdown Outside NY Courtroom

For the third time, Trump came out of the courtroom to address the cameras when…

16 hours ago

Clarence Thomas Recuses Himself For The First Time In A 1/6 Case

The Supreme Court rejected a request from John Eastman over an order to turn over…

17 hours ago