“While the cat’s away, the mice do play” … and so may your state government, according to a new study by Filipe Campante of the Harvard Kennedy School and Quoc-Anh Do of Singapore Management University. Specifically, Campante and Do found that “isolated capital cities are associated with greater levels of corruption.”
They measured isolation as the sum of log-adjusted distances between each resident and the state capital. They then used conventional measures of state corruption, plotted the two measures, and found a strong statistical correlation. The correlation grew stronger when they controlled for state population, income, education level, and other factors that previous studies had associated with corruption in state government. In fact, the isolation of the state capital was more robust than most of those other factors.
Campante and Do also tested placebo hypotheses, such as whether there was any correlation between state government corruption and the distance of residents from the state’s geographic centroid, and whether there was correlation between the isolation of the state capital and drug offenses statewide. Neither should be related, and their data showed no correlation, helping to establish that their working hypothesis was not simply a statistical fluke.
To get more stories like this, subscribe to our newsletter The Daily.
They considered possible causes and found three likely culprits:
Put those together and you have campaign contributions playing a more dominant role in state government, with state leaders less worried about media scrutiny, and less worried about being held accountable by voters. The result is more corruption, with real costs and consequences.
Campante and Do found that governors are paid significantly more in states with isolated capitals, controlling for population, income, and state budgets. They could not compare legislators’ salaries, as widely different legislative calendars make dollar-for-dollar salary comparisons meaningless. But the data on governors’ salaries suggests that other top state officials may also get higher salaries when the capital is isolated.
They also looked at data on public goods such as education, public welfare, public health, and hospitals. States with isolated capitals spend less of their budgets on public goods and more on government administration. In other words, in states with isolated capitals, more state tax dollars go to government officials … with fewer state tax dollars left to provide for the taxpayers’ needs.
As Campante and Do conclude:
From a policy perspective, in particular, one is led to conclude that extra vigilance might be needed, when it comes to polities with isolated capital cities, in order to counteract their tendency towards reduced accountability.
In short … watch your state government mice.
The Maine House majority leader is vowing to counter any move by the Republican governor…
Trump looked worn out, worn down, and broken as he left court ranting about various…
Trump's regular falling asleep in court was pointed out by the Biden campaign which pointed…
President Biden put the pressure on Trump, as he told Howard Stern that he is…
President Biden has responded to The New York Times complaining about not getting an interview…
Low energy Trump has returned to court as he is taking a deep sleep nap…
This website uses cookies.