Former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows denied ever seeking a Trump pardon, but he is refusing to state his denial under oath.
Meadows said through a spokesperson:
If Meadows never sought a pardon for his activities related to overturning the election and the 1/6 attack, it would be no problem for him to testify under oath and publicly to refute Hutchinson’s testimony.
To get more stories like this, subscribe to our newsletter The Daily.
Any person who was innocent would be running to the committee to clear their name. These statements from proven liars in the Trump administration who have not testified mean nothing.
The corporate media can’t fall into their usual trap of repeating lies as fact just so they don’t appear “biased.” When people are willing to testify under oath and swear that their testimony is true, their statements have more weight than a chief of staff who hides behind a spokesperson and refuses to testify. Mark Meadows is a proven liar, and if he wants to clear up anything that Hutchinson testified to, he can speak to the 1/6 Committee.
His refusal to testify carries more weight than any press release his spokesperson can offer.
Jason is the managing editor. He is also a White House Press Pool and a Congressional correspondent for PoliticusUSA. Jason has a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science. His graduate work focused on public policy, with a specialization in social reform movements.
Awards and Professional Memberships
Member of the Society of Professional Journalists and The American Political Science Association
Trump made a massive mistake as he tried to change the subject from David Pecker's…
Trump's effort to get a new trial in the E. Jean Carroll case wasn't just…
Donald Trump has been complaining that he can't campaign due to the criminal trial, but…
After Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) admitted that Republicans killed the bipartisan, conservative border bill,…
David Pecker testified that he believes Donald Trump also had knowledge of the catch and…
Trump's lawyer made outlandish claims of broad and comprehensive presidential immunity that liberal and conservative…
This website uses cookies.