The White House Defends Obama’s Supreme Court Criticism

Last updated on August 10th, 2014 at 05:04 pm

Senior White House advisor David Axelrod was on Meet the Press today, where defended Obama’s criticism of the recent Supreme Court decision on campaign finance at the State of the Union. Axelrod said, “I certainly think it was appropriate for the president to talk about the threat that this decision brings to our democracy.”

Here is the video:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Moderator David Gregory asked, “Was it appropriate for the president to criticize the Supreme Court during the State of the Union? And do you consider Justice Alito’s response to be appropriate or inappropriate?”

Axelrod answered, “Well, I certainly think it was appropriate for the president to talk about the threat that this decision brings to our democracy. Basically, it’s going to be open season for special interest groups and big corporations to participate in our elections with all their might and all their money. And that includes foreign–domestic branches of foreign-owned businesses, even government–foreign government-owned businesses. In fact, some of the, some of those companies signaled on Friday, according to The Wall Street Journal, that they’re going to lobby vigorously against any effort to rein this in.”

He continued, “One thing we ought to be able to agree on, and, and maybe we can here today, is that we shouldn’t have foreign-owned businesses and foreign–you know, Hugo Chavez should not be playing in American political campaigns. And I, for the life of me, don’t understand why we wouldn’t make that illegal.”

In an age of multinational corporate interests the scenario that Axelrod laid out is not an unrealistic possibility. Of course corporations are going to lobby against any attempts to right the wrong carried out by this decision legislatively. The ruling gave corporations, all corporations unlimited ability to influence elections.

Obama’s criticism at the State of the Union was not only justified, but the president had a moral obligation to directly address the Supreme Court. The Court has opened the door to the biggest threat to the American electoral system in our lifetime, and it is the constitutional duty of the two remaining branches of our government to protect the integrity of our electoral process.

Follow Me
Jason Easley

Jason is the managing editor. He is also a White House Press Pool and a Congressional correspondent for PoliticusUSA. Jason has a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science. His graduate work focused on public policy, with a specialization in social reform movements. Awards and  Professional Memberships Member of the Society of Professional Journalists and The American Political Science Association

Recent Posts

Trump Refused To Approve California Disaster Relief Because The State Is Blue

When he was president, Trump refused to approve disaster for the people of California until…

8 hours ago

The Trump Campaign Hasn’t Disputed Any Of The Facts In Jack Smith’s Filing

Instead of disputing the facts in Jack Smith's filing, the Donald Trump campaign is screaming…

1 day ago

Jack Smith Drops An Evidence Bomb On Trump’s Campaign

In the redacted document, Special Counsel Jack Smith laid out a devastating case against Donald…

1 day ago

Danger for Trump as Voters Really Liked the Comparatively Normal Debate

After voters commented that the debate was more of a presidential debate than the actual…

1 day ago

Trump Backs Out of 60 Minutes Special, Harris Will Go On as Planned

Donald Trump has pulled out of the 60 Minutes primetime election special that's been an…

2 days ago

Trump Failed His Promises to Michigan Auto Industry Before COVID

Ex-president Donald Trump has been making repeated promises about returning Michigan auto industry jobs to…

2 days ago