Supreme Court Agrees To Hear Case That Could Undermine One Person One Vote


On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a case that could fundamentally alter the way districts are drawn in the United States. If the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, it could also undermine the bedrock American principle of “one person, one vote”.

The case brought forward by Texas plaintiffs Sue Evenwel and Edward Pfenninger, argues that Texas Senate Districts dilute the plaintiffs’ voting power, because a higher proportion of residents is eligible to vote in their districts than in other districts in the state. The two plaintiffs are represented by the right-wing group Project on Fair Representation, which also brought the suit against the Voting Rights Act to the Supreme Court.

Under current law, federal and state districts are drawn based on the principle that each district should have equal or nearly equal populations. The challenge brought before the Supreme Court would alter that formula, instead redrawing district’s based on eligible voter population, rather than total population. If the court accepts the plaintiff’s arguments, it will clear the way for redrawing districts, to further dilute the political power of already disenfranchised groups like children, prisoners, and undocumented immigrants.

If the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, it will undermine “representational equality” which ensures that each elected representative in a body governs roughly the same number of people. It would also throw redistricting into chaos, as Census population data would be replaced by a hodgepodge of competing formulas used to estimate the voter eligible population in each district.

The court agreed to hear the case even though it has not been tested in the lower courts, which would typically rule on a case before it reaches the Supreme Court. The intended effect of the change would be to dilute the political power of Latinos, children, and voters in urban areas while disproportionately empowering older, rural and whiter voters.

While it remains uncertain how the Supreme Court will rule on the case, their decision to hear the case already confirms a  familiar pattern with the Roberts’ Court. When it comes to election law, the only guiding principle that governs the decisions of the conservative justices on the Robert’s Court, is will the change benefit Republicans? If the answer is yes, then that is how the court will likely rule.

Recent Posts

James Comer Hits A New Low By Blaming Democrats For His Hunter Biden Cowardice

House Oversight Chair Rep. James Comer (R-KY) claims Democrats 'scream and yell' in hearings. Learn…

47 mins ago

Trump Tells His Supporters To Go To Cities And Intimidate Non-White Voters

While speaking in Iowa, Donald Trump urged his supporters to go to cities like Detroit…

19 hours ago

Ron DeSantis Gets Outed As A Massive God Fraud

As a presidential candidate, Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) has wrapped himself in the evangelical movement,…

2 days ago

The Republican Running To Replace George Santos Just Crashed And Burned On CNN

Kellen Curry, the Republican running to replace George Santos in the House, had a disaster…

2 days ago

Democrats Are Livid After Georgia Republicans Propose New Black Majority District Con

Georgia Republicans were court ordered to create a new black majority House district. They responded…

2 days ago

George Santos Jumps In A Car And Quickly Flees The Capitol After Getting Expelled

After George Santos was expelled from the House of Representatives, he did not speak to…

2 days ago