Sexist MSNBC All Male Panel Mansplains That Hillary Clinton Needs To Speak More Softly

Last updated on March 7th, 2016 at 04:21 pm

During Super Saturday coverage, an all-male panel on MSNBC led by Chris Matthews cut away from Hillary Clinton’s speech to discuss how she needs to speak more softly when she’s in front of a microphone. The three men then mansplained that this isn’t a matter of gender, in case anyone was wondering.


To get more stories like this, subscribe to our newsletter The Daily.

The men decided that when Hillary Clinton is speaking in an interview, she does well. It’s just when she is using a microphone to speak to a crowd that she has issues, apparently, as she speaks up like all public speakers do when they are speaking in front a large crowd. They tried to avoid using the loaded words that hung in the air like “shrill”. But the message was obvious enough to outrage many women journalists who heard the sexist whistle.

No one asked a woman if it might be related to gender because apparently men are the experts on sexism.

Being criticized for being “shrill” and sounding “angry” is old news for powerful women. Women are supposed to be strong but not so strong that they sound “strident”. Strident is bad.

MSNBC needs to send a memo out to their hosts and panel guests that instructs them how to determine if they sound like a sexist jerk. Hint: Maybe a panel of men aren’t experts on deciding what qualifies as gendered criticism.

Here’s a little schooling on how not to sound like a sexist jerk from Time:

Avoid Describing the Sound of My Feminine Voice. Also, the Tone of It.

Women naturally have higher-pitched voices than men. Do we need to point it out? There’s no male equivalent of “shrill” or “screechy.” And I don’t believe there’s one for “nasal-car honk” tone either. And while we’re at it, let’s avoid descriptors like “whiny,” “nagging” or “complaining” to refer to women. Unless of course you’d use them to refer to a man too.

Maybe before male hosts announce something isn’t due to gender they should know something about sexism from… oh… say a woman. A panel full of men shouldn’t criticize Clinton’s voice for not being soft enough. It is sexist. It’s right next to commenting on her hair.

Sexist commentary about a politician reduces their standing among voters. This has been proven in studies. The media needs to get it together. There’s no excuse for this kind of ignorance about well documented evidence regarding what constitutes sexism. It’s not up for debate and it’s not up to a panel of all men.

Recent Posts

Nikki Haley Has Done Immense Damage To Trump In South Carolina

The myth of Trump's strength as a candidate is taking another hit in South Carolina,…

3 hours ago

Trump Uses Notecards In South Carolina To Remember The Names Of His Kids

Some troubling signs in South Carolina as Trump had to read the names of his…

4 hours ago

Trump Endorses Biden In Massive CPAC Gaffe

Trump, at one point, was trying to criticize Biden at CPAC when he ended up…

8 hours ago

Trump’s Teleprompter Speech Flops And Bores CPAC

Trump was chained to his teleprompter and has been met with disinterest and mostly muted…

9 hours ago

There Were A Whole Lot Of White People At Trump’s Black Conservative Forum Speech

Donald Trump spoke to the Black Conservative Forum recently, but a video of the audience…

11 hours ago

House Republicans Refused To Quickly Seat Tom Suozzi

Democrat Tom Suozzi won a special House election to replace George Santos, but House Republicans…

14 hours ago