As Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” Plan Hits A Legal Snag, His Administration Turns to SCOTUS

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco is preventing President Donald Trump’s administration from enforcing its Migrant Protection Protocols, otherwise known as the “Remain in Mexico” policy, for asylum-seekers to stay in the country. Restrictions remain in place until March 11 for review by the Supreme Court. The ruling only applies to Arizona and California, the states under the court’s authority, and not New Mexico and Texas.

The ruling affirms the court’s ruling last week that the policy violates both United States and international law. The policy, which went into effect in January 2019, requires asylum-seekers to remain in Mexico while they wait for their immigration hearings. The Trump administration considers the policy a great success, saying it has curbed the “uncontrolled flows” of migrants at the southern border, but advocacy groups have found that thousands of migrants required to wait have been kidnapped, raped, or tortured.

The appeals court’s decision will take effect on March 12 if the Supreme Court opts not to hear the case. Attorneys with the Justice Department argue that stopping the program would create “massive and irreparable national security and public safety concerns” because U.S. Customs and Border Protection lacks enough detention space to house thousands of new migrants who, they contend, would create a “rush on the southern border.”

Lawyers challenging the policy say the Supreme Court should deny the government’s request for a stay because the 9th Circuit’s original decision did not require the government to allow asylum-seekers affected by the policy to immediately re-enter the United States. They point out in court filings that the decision requires the government pursue an “orderly unwinding” of the policy.

The Supreme Court has sided with the Trump administration on immigration issues before. In January, the court allowed the government to temporarily continue enforcing a policy barring migrants from applying for asylum unless they’d already been denied asylum in another country while in transit to the United States.

Recent Posts

Lindsey Graham is Furious That Amazon Offered to Help Biden Deliver Vaccines, But Not Trump

Following the November election, Donald Trump essentially stopped doing his job. And it was a…

52 mins ago

Biden’s Inaugural Address Draws Millions More Viewers Than Trump’s

Biden's inaugural address was watched by nearly 2 million more television viewers than tuned in…

2 hours ago

Dr. Fauci Can Barely Contain His Joy As He Says He Feels Liberated Working With Biden

A happy looking Dr. Anthony Fauci said that he took no pleasure in contradicting Trump,…

2 hours ago

Mitch McConnell Is Now Making Up Senate Rules In Desperate Bid To Save The Filibuster

Mitch McConnell is desperate to save the filibuster, so he has taken to making up…

3 hours ago

Judge rejects NRA bid to end or move New York lawsuit seeking its closure

A New York state judge on Thursday rejected the National Rifle Association's bid to dismiss…

5 hours ago

FBI Director Wray Gets Request To Investigate Parler For Capitol Attack

House Oversight Committee Chair Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) has requested that FBI Director Chris Wray launch…

6 hours ago

This website uses cookies.