Gov. Mark Sanford Compares Accepting Stimulus Money to Child Abuse

Gov. Mark Sanford (R-SC) continues to try to give a rise to his 2012 presidential hopes by waging war against the stimulus package. Today on the Glenn Beck show, Sanford said that accepting stimulus money was the equivalent of fiscal child abuse.

Here is the video courtesy of Think Progress:

Host Glenn Beck sought to clarify Sanford’s point that it was better for the future of the children in his state not to take the federal stimulus money. Sanford said, “Since we don’t have any of this money that’s now being dispensed from Washington, DC; since we’re going out and printing money and we’re issuing debt to solve a problem that was created by too much debt; since that’s taking place, and since those costs will be borne by the next generation, in fact it is sort of fiscal child abuse to do what we’re doing.”

Let’s give Gov. Sanford a little straight talk about poor children in his state. According to the most recent data available from National Center for Children in Poverty, compiled before the recession, 19% of the children in his state live in poverty, and 39% of those children have only one parent that is employed either part year or part time, while 33% of the children don’t have an employed parent. According to South Carolina Kids Count, 14% of First Graders are not ready for first grade, and 13% of students in the state have to repeat one of the first three grades. Thirty three percent of all tenth graders fail one part of their exit exam on their first try, and 32% of students don’t graduate high school.

The real child abuse comes in healthcare. According to a November 2008 study by FamiliesUSA, South Carolina has the 13th highest percentage of uninsured children in the country at 12.2%, and even worse, 88.5% of these uninsured children come from homes where at least one parent works year round. As bad as these numbers are, I suspect that all have gotten worse during this recession. The state’s unemployment rate is already at 11%, and is expected to peak at 14%, yet Sanford thinks it is child abuse to help poor families with stimulus money.

We all know that Sanford is just one of the Republican governors who are throwing their states under the bus in the hope of being the 2012 GOP nominee. However, to compare the taking of federal stimulus money to child abuse when the governor is turning down money that would help the poor children of his state, for the sole purpose of advancing his own political ambitions is wrong. Sanford is trying to build his rep as real conservative off of turning down stimulus money. While this may appeal to some Republicans, I can’t see how it helps his political star with the rest of the country.

4 Replies to “Gov. Mark Sanford Compares Accepting Stimulus Money to Child Abuse”


    Among the numerous rumors swirling around Columbia is a report that President Barack Obama has told Gov. Mark Sanford that if he does not apply for federal stimulus funds, the money will not be available for South Carolina.

    And The Palmetto Scoop has now confirmed that Obama has, in fact, sent Sanford a very blunt, personal letter saying just that.

    The correspondence reportedly states that roughly $700 million in discretionary stimulus money allocated for South Carolina will be revoked on Friday if Sanford declines to accept the funds and that, by law, no alternative options can be accepted.

    Take it or lose it

  2. Mark Sanford is a big joke somebody needs to let him know no one in South Carolina is laughing. God have mercy on him this is surely racism. When Bush gave the checks last year there was no problem. I ask you now, what is the problem? We in South Carolina need the money stop acting foolishly. This is not about you it’s about the state of South Carolina and saving people jobs, considering the money will have to be pay back by our state whether or not we take it. Mark Sanford it’s a stupid decision don’t make my children pay for toys they never played with.

  3. Mark Sanford, its a shame that Americans are so ignorant and simple minded to your debate over the stimulus package. How can you possibly hope to help anybody in the State by creating MORE debt. The Stimulus is a loan…yes hear me, a LOAN. Eventually, the money will have to be paid back, so honestly tell me the point of it without a plan for the future and ways to pay back the money? Let me give you a simple example…you own a home and you can’t make your payments so you go into debt, well the bank or “U.S. Government” comes and offers you ANOTHER loan for your home…so not only are you in the hole by however much you already owe the bank, you owe another loan on top. NOW, argue the stimulus package, can’t can you?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.