2 Responses to “Palin: Obama Should Have Vetoed the Stimulus Bill”

  1. Anonymous Anonymous says:

    And obviously the author of the article doesn’t know what they are talking about. The rolls in question are the welfare rolls. This bill almost completely undoes the welfare reforms of the late 1990s. Once again states would be paid for increasing their welfare rolls.

    Even if that were not true, Opposing the bill based on increases in food stamps, unemployment and SCHIP is a principled position as well. You may not agree with it, but that does not make it an invalid reason for opposing a bloated spending bill.

    [Reply]

  2. Anonymous Anonymous says:

    Actually, Medicaid spending was not cut from the final bill. In state matching funds alone, the stimulus allocation is over $87, with additional funds appropriated through various other programs. Still, Obama and the democrats deserve the chance to do what they were elected to do. These are trying times, and we need more than tax cuts.

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply