SCOTUS Prayer Ruling Silences New York Town’s Non-Christians

image

Of all the revolutionary ideas put forth by America’s Founders, prohibiting the establishment of religion was likely the greatest gift the Constitution’s framers bestowed on the young nation and subsequent generations of Americans. In fact, freedom of, and more importantly freedom from, religion was so important that the first line of the First Amendment prohibited the establishment of religion. It is a certainty that the Founders were well aware of the abuses on the people that establishing a religion would result in, and it is just as certain that “churches” took it as a personal affront they were forbidden from demanding adherence to their religion by the Constitution.

Despite the 1st Amendment, different Christian groups have made every effort to impose their religion on the people throughout the nation’s history, and after two-hundred-thirty-eight years, they were granted the authority to begin establishing Christianity by Supreme Court fiat. Besides the Catholic Court’s ruling that the “free exercise” clause trumps the Establishment Clause in the recent Hobby Lobby decision, the Catholic ruling that government prayers were the purview of Christians was the final insult to the rotting corpse of the prohibition on establishing religion.

After the Catholics gave permission to Christians to invoke Jesus and god prior to government meetings in the Greece v. Galloway ruling, one knew it was just a short matter of time before Christianity would be officially established as the New York town’s religion. As expected, the town of Greece quickly adopted an invocation policy excluding non-religious citizens and shutting out other religions reflecting a new Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) model prayer policy devised in the wake of the court abolishing the Establishment Clause.

ADF is a hard-line conservative Christian law group pushing the new dictate in towns and cities across America. The new Christian rule “avails itself of the Supreme Court’s recognition” that government prayers are constitutional and restricts opening prayers to “assemblies with an established presence [in the Town of Greece] that regularly meet for the primary purpose of sharing a religious perspective.” It is beyond refute that the religion most steeped in “sharing” a religious perspective is Christianity; over the past few years Americans have learned firsthand that “sharing the Christian perspective” entails imposing its edicts on the people by government. In the town of Greece, the board clerk determines which faith has an “established presence” and which faith’s “primary purpose is sharing a religious perspective.”

The ‘town’ attorney defended the new Christian edict and said, “I don’t feel that the policy in any way singles out or discriminates against any form of belief.” No, they just forbid citizens of other forms of belief, or of no belief, from offering invocations before government meetings, and in a predominately Christian community, only Christians can invoke their deity. It is noteworthy that the lawsuit against the town of Greece was brought by Jews and atheists who are now prohibited from offering opening remarks according to the Alliance Defending Freedom policy. The plaintiffs were weary of sitting through years of Christian prayers praising Jesus Christ, and sought redress from the Court they assumed would uphold the United States Constitution.

In her dissent in Greece v. Galloway, Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan warned the Catholic Court’s decision would lead to discrimination against non-Christian faiths, and accused the Catholics of being blind to the “essential meaning of the religious worship in Greece’s town hall, along with its capacity to exclude and divide.” It took less than four month’s for Justice Kagan’s warning to become reality.

The executive director of Americans United For the Separation of Church and State, Barry Lynn, represented the plaintiffs in the Supreme Court case, and assailed the Alliance Defending Freedom policy as unconstitutional and “a warning sign for cities and towns all across the United States” that will adopt the ADF policy. Lynn said town leaders “said they’re (prayers) open to anybody. Now they’re not open to anybody. It’s really a scam. This is a way to go back to business as we had sadly always expected it. They only want Christians to participate. This is a step backward.”

It is also constitutional regardless what Lynn thinks because the Catholic Court described “public prayer as a larger exercise in civic recognition” that Justice Anthony Kennedy ‘implied’ was designed to “represent, rather than exclude or coerce nonbelievers.” Two of the Catholic Justices, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, said if non-believers do not want to hear Christian prayers, they know where the doors are because the ruling did mean they were being “coerced” to stay and pray with Christians.

During arguments before the Catholic Court, the town board of Greece stressed that it was really fighting not just for Christian prayers, but for the right of all people to express their religious views regardless of their faith. But they were violating number 9 of the first iteration of the Ten Commandments (there were two) that forbids lying. There is a reason the plaintiffs in the case, Jewish and non-believers, brought the lawsuit against the town in the first place and argued that the predominately Christian prayers were violations of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The Catholic Court disabused the plaintiffs of their false belief that the Establishment Clause was valid when it ruled against the Jewish and atheist plaintiffs. Now, it is constitutional for the establishment of government prayers that the town of Greece can reserve for purveyors the one faith that exists with the “primary purpose of sharing a religious perspective;” the Christian perspective.

It was certain the High Court’s Greece v. Galloway ruling was going to result in establishing the predominate faith in the town (Christianity) as the sole government meeting prayer offerings. Prior to the Court’s ruling, only four non-traditional Christian prayers were offered over the course of several years, and the Alliance Defending Freedom’s new template policy is specific that only faiths with an “established presence for the primary purpose of sharing a religious perspective” and was tailor-made for a city clerk to select Christian-only prayer offerings.

The Catholics on the High Court made a serious error in ruling that any government prayers were constitutional. Conservative Christians are notorious for taking liberties to impose their religion on the entire population, and regardless the Catholic Court’s pathetic reasoning that tradition dictated government prayers were Constitutional, they knew the ruling would result in establishing Christian-only prayers at government meetings because Justice Elena Kagan warned them. The tragedy is that now that the ADF has a religious edict in place in the form of a fill-in template, it is just a matter of time before cities across America will mandate Christian-only prayers and deny other faiths and non-believers their free exercise of religion. Atheists and agnostics were denied their freedom of speech because they do not pray, have no well-established assembly, and have no religious perspective to share.

 

If you’re ready to read more from the unbossed and unbought Politicus team, sign up for our newsletter here!

0

31 Replies to “SCOTUS Prayer Ruling Silences New York Town’s Non-Christians”

  1. There goes the establishment clause. May it rest in peace. For those who say both parties are the same? Go the H E DOUBLE HOCKEY STICK

  2. I do not understand how this happened. Where were all the talking heads? Oh let me guess. Syria and Ferguson. They are very important issues as well, but this goes to the core of our country and its freedoms. We must stop this illness from spreading. I saw christians on the border scaring little children and carrying guns in Ferguson. Stop this now!

  3. By 2020 the court will be 6-4 liberal and it’s business? To undo all the BS crap the current court has promoted. They’re going to be a busy bunch…

  4. we can only hope that these false Christians are so blatant in segregating people due to their religion that the people see what is happening. Public prayer is a short step to bigger and better things for these people. Just like ALEC, they are involved in writing laws and those laws will not be to the benefit of the people. there is nothing in history worse than a government ruled by religious fanatics. And a fanatic is exactly what a Christian fundamentalist is.

  5. Citizens United, Hobby Lobby, Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC (2012)—The Supreme Court ruled that the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment bars the government from interfering in ministerial appointments for religious organizations, including hearing wrongful employment termination suits. Public opinion was divided on the ruling, with conservatives lauding the opinion and liberals asserting that religious organizations should abide by the same rules as other non-profits.
    The signs have been there and just wait to what’s coming up in the pipeline for next year

  6. i bet that the ‘catholic’ SCOTUS court doesn’t even realize that it bit its own ass. or maybe it does and really wanted it this way?

  7. I hope (and pray) that you are right, John. These hissing slithering ChristoLizards must be forced back into their swamps… Soon.

  8. Christians and Muslims have some serious problems when it comes to reality. Wish their gods would take them all to another planet and they can all kill each other about who’s got is more powerful. I’d pay to watch that one.

  9. As if the establishment of a state religion wasn’t bad enough in itself, we are forced to be ruled by Cathlic dogma which is not scriptural and is not recognized even by many other Chistrians!

    This simply cannot be allowed to stand or they will be teaching creationism in our Public schools – if we still have public schools that is.

  10. Impeach the hijackers of the U.S. Constitution.

    The interpretation of the bible is open to interpretation. The U.S. Constitution is not.

    “Once you attempt legislation upon religious grounds, you open the way for every kind of intolerance and religious persecution.”
    William Butler Yeats

  11. To think when Pres. Kennedy went before the religious group of pastors to assure them that the Pope would not be the head of a cabinet in his administration, he forgot the Supreme Court Judges.

    History repeats itself. You bet right back to the church ruling the world.

  12. Can’t trust em. Money laundering, child rape, sexual assult, discrimination of women.
    Yeah, I don’t think so. So many hypocrites, just watch the liars on fox “news” who sell themselves as Christians constantly bearing false witness for their love of$$$$.

  13. I hope you’re right except there are only 9 justices on the court not 10. 6-3 liberal will be perfectly acceptable. We need to keep the senate blue to make it happen. A red senate won’t approve of any non-cons

  14. Give it some time! We are near to an amazing event. It will happen a few days after some moron sets off another nuclear weapon.

  15. The supreme court has pushed us down the road of religious violence that has plagued the middle east for over a thousand years. It is only a matter of time before some city or state takes it upon itself to claim that the establishment clause only applies to the federal government and uses this ruling to create a state religion so they can persecute other religions and non-believers. I think it’s time we talked impeachment for those members of SCOTUS whose rulings constitute treason against this country and the constitution they swore to uphold.

  16. Attributing this to the Court’s “catholics,” when one of the Roman Catholic Justices, Justice Sotomayor, dissented, is not only sloppy writing, but represents a needless swipe at Roman Catholics. There have been plenty of liberal politicians who have identified as Roman Catholic, and likewise there have been many conservative ones. Merely identifying as a Roman Catholic is not necessarily a good predictor of one’s political views.

    And if anyone is wondering, no, I am not a Roman Catholic — I am an Episcopalian (Anglican).

  17. Roman Catholics have no problem with Darwin’s theory of evolution or the Big Bang Theory. You are confusing them with evangelicals.

  18. They are political animals first and foremost (notwithstanding their protestations to the contrary). The five conservative justices wanted to throw a little red meat to the portion of the GOP’s constituency that is comprised of the religious right. The GOP has been playing the religious right like this for years. The occasional throwing of a bone to pacify them is, in that twisted Republican universe, just smart politics.

  19. Then as a Roman Catholic shouldn’t one speak out against these Pharisees? Look I am a atheist but I have read enough of the doctrine that IMO the church speaks about social justice. Where are the voices in your church that speaks for the issues that you say Jesus died for?

  20. Where did I say or even remotely imply that one shouldn’t speak out about bad Supreme Court rulings? My point is that the article rather strongly implies that this decision flows from the five conservative justices’ Roman Catholicism. It does not. It is a product of their political conservatism.

  21. Then what could it be? I mean there was a couple of centuries of the establishment clause so that couldn’t be it. It surely wasn’t past SCOTUS rulings on religion in the past unless they count the ones they ruled on and use that as their basis. Please help me out here when a couple of them belong to OPUS DEI I mean what else could they possibly base their rulings on?

  22. I am well aware that the Catholic Church has never had a problem with evolution and other science. That’s not what I was referring to.

    I was addressing the “no contraceptives allowed” stance of the Catholics. That is not scriptural – it’s Catholic dogma, and should never be forced on Protestants and others who are not bound by dogma. And we all know – or we should know – where this is ultimately headed. The end game is denying contraceptives to all women.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.