Republicans Condemn North Korean Human Rights Violations While Ignoring Their Own

hypocrisy-meter
It is safe to say that no-one likes a hypocrite, particularly someone that fails to follow their own self-expressed morality and high ethical standards while criticizing others for engaging in the same despicable behavior. Republicans are certainly guilty of hypocrisy on many levels, but it is likely because being a rank hypocrite is a uniquely American trait and defining characteristic of the United States phony human rights advocacy at home and around the world. It is another sign of American exceptionalism that would be a source of national shame for decent people, but sadly, more and more Americans are no longer decent people.

It was announced on Tuesday, and ignored by the mainstream conservative media, that the United States of America co-sponsored a groundbreaking United Nation’s resolution condemning North Korea for human rights abuses and recommended the prosecution of its leaders for crimes against humanity at the International Criminal Court. What the resolution means is that North Korean leaders could be hauled before the International Criminal Court at The Hague for punishment and to provide justice for victims of atrocities, war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The hypocrisy of this nation co-sponsoring a resolution condemning anyone country for human rights abuses (torture) is beyond the pale. Particularly in light of the recent Senate Intelligence Report verifying what the world has known for several years; America is guilty of committing gross human rights abuses on its own citizens and “suspected terrorists” held in captivity. America has already been called to task for several human rights abuses on its own citizens including allowing racially-motivated law enforcement officers to legally gun down and murder young unarmed African Americans, criminalizing homelessness, withholding food and shelter, and the war crime of torture; exactly what this hypocritical country demands North Korean officials face prosecution for in International Criminal Court.

The American-sponsored resolution is the result of nine months of investigations by the United Nations Human Rights Commission (UNHRC) that concluded North Korea’s leaders could be held responsible for egregious crimes, including widespread killing and torture. The HRC’s 400-page report recommended that the Security Council refer North Korea’s leaders to the International Criminal Court for prosecution calling the gravity and nature of abuses in the country “without parallel in the contemporary world.” The report was compiled before the U.S. Senate Intelligence report on Bush-CIA gross human rights abuses that challenge the assertion that North Korea’s human rights abuses (torture and mass killings) are “without parallel in the contemporary world.”

Although it is common knowledge the Bush administration authorized and approved torture, few Americans will remember that literally over 655,000 innocent civilians were mass-murdered during the unprovoked invasion and occupation of Iraq. Even before the Senate released its damning report on Bush-directed war crimes and human rights abuses, Americans and the entire world were aware of America’s mistreatment and torture of so-called enemy combatants, “suspected terrorists,” and often innocent Muslims.

Historically, America did not consider torture, including waterboarding, an acceptable and noble practice conservatives are certain is legal. For example, in 1775 Founding Father George Washington said “Should any American be so base and infamous as to injure any prisoner… I do most earnestly enjoin you to bring him to such severe and exemplary punishment as the enormity of the crime requires. Should it extend to death itself, it will not be disproportional to the cause that brings shame, disgrace and ruin to themselves and their country.” Conservatives, Republicans, and a majority of religious right evangelicals regard torture as acceptable and, stunningly, a biblical practice.

Beginning in 1943, two years before the end of World War II, the United States charged Japanese military officials for numerous war crimes such as forcing prisoners to stand outside, subjecting prisoners to solitary confinement, and classified waterboarding as torture. In fact, according to several articles cited in the Tokyo Tribunal and UNWCC documents, “the U.S. government defined (less extreme measures than Bush-CIA practices) Japanese practices as gross violations of international law; “The Washington War Crimes office clearly defined waterboarding and solitary confinement as ‘ill-treatment’ and ‘torture.'”

Prosecuting waterboarding as torture in America was not reserved for war criminals as evidenced by the 1983 conviction of four Texas law enforcement officers using “enhanced interrogation” techniques (waterboarding) to secure a confession. The Ronald Reagan Department of Justice prosecuted, and won a 10-year sentence against the sheriff and four years in prison for the deputies. Still, Bush’s Justice Department and national security team claimed that subjecting a person to the near-drowning is not a crime and something Dick Cheney swore he would “do again in a heartbeat” if given the opportunity.

There is no doubt Bush et al admitted torturing prisoners. C.I.A. director John Brennan admitted torturing prisoners in a CIA statement but claimed it was legal because Bush-Cheney. He said, “We made mistakes. Detainees were subjected to enhanced interrogation techniques (torture), which the DOJ determined at the time to be lawful and which were duly authorized by the Bush Administration.” The techniques were prohibited by President Obama through an executive order when he took office in January 2009.

According to one the men heading the C.I.A. during the Bush administration, John McLaughlin, “We went to the Department of Justice at least four times to make sure that what we were doing was consistent with the U.S. Constitution. And, on top of that John Durham, one of the toughest professional prosecutors in the Department of Justice, was asked by the Obama Administration to look at this program in detail, which he did, and he came back and said, ‘No prosecutable offenses.'” If that is the case, why then did President Barack Obama issue an executive order when he took office in January 2009 prohibiting the use of torture if the practice was legal? Obviously, torture is not legal, unless the exceptionally hypocritical United States of America is doing the torture.

Ben Emmerson, the United Nations’ special rapporteur on human rights said official authorization from agencies within the U.S. does not free those who carried out torture from facing justice. “The fact that the policies revealed in this report were authorized at a high level within the U.S. government provides no excuse whatsoever. Indeed, it reinforces the need for criminal accountability.” He added that as a signatory to the U.N. Convention Against Torture, and Article VI, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, the United States is legally obligated to prosecute acts of torture. Further, Emmerson said “States are not free to maintain or permit impunity for these grave crimes.”

However, America will not bring criminal charges, or hand over to international courts, anyone involved in authorizing, approving, or executing the Bush-CIA’s torture program. However, America will, and did, co-sponsor a United Nations’ resolution calling for North Koreans to be condemned for human rights abuses and its leaders prosecuted for crimes against humanity at the International Criminal Court to be punished and provide justice for victims of atrocities, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. If America was really an exceptional nation, it would hand over Bush officials to the International Criminal Court, but America is only exceptional in that as a nation it is, like dirty filthy Republicans and evangelicals praising inhumane torture, above the law and blatantly hypocritical.

10 Replies to “Republicans Condemn North Korean Human Rights Violations While Ignoring Their Own”

  1. As long as you keep in mind that the GOP has one, and only one, policy-pandering to the very wealthy-then you already know that anything else they say reeks of hypocrisy. They have no interest in “promoting the general welfare” or doing anything that benefits anyone but the 1%. Environment? No. Income inequality? No. Jobs? No. There literally is not one policy they espouse that is good for the country as a whole. It is, then, so much easier to try and find something they say that is NOT hypocritical. If stories about non-hypocritical GOP statements only were run however, no one would write about them very often and they would just fade from public consciousness. Is this a bad thing?

  2. What I find interesting is that U.S. co-sponsored a resolution to send North Korea’s leaders to the ICC, yet the U.S. has never been a signatory to the ICC.

    Apparently Clinton agreed to signing but never took it to congress for approval, and Bush absolutely refused to sign on to it. In hindsight one can understand why Bush would reject it.

    We need to clean up our own house before we condemn any other country. And what right do we have to co-sponsor anything we, ourselves, have never accepted?

    This is beyond disgusting.

  3. I suppose faux news will have Dick Darth Vader Chaney on, to denounce North Korea on human rights violations, being a subject he knows all to well.
    Oh how this country lately has “Sooo” much to be proud off, “thank you repugs” for having selective memory loss about war crimes or maybe you really are brain dead. Again you idiots tell the world “do as I say not as I do”, how stupid can you make us look to the world.

  4. I agree 100%. The meme that “they’re all the same” when referring to Republicans and Democrats needs to be exposed for what it is…utter nonsense perpetrated by the GOP and echoed by the corporate-owned news media. Your voice is being heard my friend. Keep it up. See you around!

  5. We all know that the Bush(shrub) presidency was filled with those who never ever thought for one sec. of the result of their actions. We also know that Mccain and Lindsey would go to war at the drop of a hat. We know too the world knows.
    Why hasn’t this court taken these TORTURSERS to account? Mccain for once stood against torture but war, now that is another question.
    I for one would love to see these torturers brought to court. I know I am not alone.
    Mccains stand on this subject may be the only honorable action in his whole life.

  6. They also have condemned the situation in Cuba while doing business with China. With these greed monsters it’s all about the federal reserve notes. The Reich wing has no shame.

  7. Well someone is not ignoring the bush cabal war crimes

    War Crimes Case Filed In Germany Against Bush Administration By Human Rights Group

    A human rights group in Berlin, Germany, has filed a criminal complaint against the architects of the George W. Bush administration’s torture program. The European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights has accused former Bush administration officials, including CIA Director George Tenet and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, of war crimes, and called for an immediate investigation by a German prosecutor.
    http://www.democracynow.org/2014/12/19/should_bush_and_cheney_be_tried

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.